You can present it at the summit - it would be a good discussion. 
PS: almost everything can be done via pub/sub - more or less verbose.. ;-)

/Steffen

> On 14 Jan 2015, at 10:59, Piotr Nosek <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Indeed it is somewhat "pub-subish" but with nodes where everyone is 
> publisher. I guess it could be implemented on top of 0060 too, but I think 
> that MUC stanzas are logically more fitting and are not unnecessarily verbose.
> There, you see? It has already provoked discussion. :)
> Please allow me to prepare the design of such solution (taking 0060 into 
> consideration too). In worst case everyone will tell me it's all worthless 
> after 2-minute discussion, right? :P
> 
> ----- Oryginalna wiadomość -----
> Od: "Steven Lloyd Watkin" <[email protected]>
> Do: "XMPP Standards" <[email protected]>
> Wysłane: środa, 14 styczeń 2015 10:16:26
> Temat: Re: [Standards] Discussion topics for the summit
> 
> 
> 
> Sounds more like pub sub to me :) 
> On 14 Jan 2015 08:27, "Piotr Nosek" < [email protected] > 
> wrote: 
> 
> 
> Hi everyone, 
> 
> I would like to discuss a functionality that we have implemented in the past 
> for mobile applications. It could become a new standard perhaps, because 
> there is quite high demand for it. 
> What I have in mind is a kind of presence-less MUC. People using e.g. 
> WhatsApp will know what I'm talking about. 
> The highlights of such solution are: 
> * No presence information - when you're in the group, you're visible for 
> everyone 
> * No hiding behind nicks 
> * Very simple role set: just owner and members 
> Internally we call this extension "MUC light" and if nobody disagrees, I 
> guess it's the name of the topic I propose. :) 
> 
> Regards, 
> Piotr 
> 
> ----- Oryginalna wiadomość ----- 
> Od: "Kevin Smith" < [email protected] > 
> Do: "XMPP Standards" < [email protected] > 
> Wysłane: wtorek, 13 styczeń 2015 14:04:10 
> Temat: [Standards] Discussion topics for the summit 
> 
> Hi folks, 
> Council had a think about possible topics for the summit, and came up with 
> these. If you have thoughts about other things to discuss, please share them 
> (and hopefully we’ll capture them in the wiki before the summit). 
> 
> Social network interop (Buddlycloud/Movim/SåT), device-consistent chat (MAM, 
> Carbons, read markers, etc.), Distributed MUC, IoT. 
> 
> /K 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to