On 27 August 2015 at 21:42, Evgeny Khramtsov <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:13:14 +0100 > Dave Cridland <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The rest of these comments, though, I largely agree with - there's > > been talk of putting together both a new profile XEP, listing the > > things any "modern messaging app" should support, and also putting > > together a bunch of sensible tutorials. I think you're underlining > > how important those are. > > I even think such list is more important than this FAQ. Also clients > compatibility list would be great. SIP folks are doing something like > that regularly (https://www.sipit.net/SIPitSummaries). XSF did that in > the past btw. > > The profile XEP is really important, I agree. A compatibility list might be interesting, but I think the only real compatibility issues we have are where a protocol has switched namespace due to incompatible versions, and some clients and/or servers end up sticking with the older versions. I don't think that situation helps us at all. > > but as I say, my Solitaire app uses more battery than > > my IM app on my phone even without such a spec. And I don't even play > > solitaire that much. > > I think we should not compare the worst with XMPP. For example, > Whatsapp doesn't drain battery. > Right; I wasn't intending to compare it with the worst thing I could find. Solitaire doesn't use much battery - Conversations still uses less. Dave
