Hi Just to add a bit more. I’ve done a maritime safety data service for Cobham / Immersat satellites (http://www.inmarsat.com/service/maritime-safety/). This is based on XMPP and MUC and some other XEPs. The work is done as a consultant so I have no other direct access for documentation.
/Steffen > On 11 Aug 2015, at 09:06, Dominik Renzel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Am 10.08.2015 um 22:11 schrieb Dave Cridland: >> On 10 August 2015 at 18:37, Dominik Renzel <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Nice compilation, Dave. >>> >>> As one of the guys from xmppresearch.org, I might add a bit from the >>> academic side. There is quite a body of literature available on XMPP >>> research (and - yes, we keep collecting!). We're currently working on a >>> survey paper on a collection of XMPP research from 2003 till today. I can't >>> reveal too much, but a little bit of overview allows me to wield the >>> academagic battle-axe at least for two myths. >>> >>> Myth Two: >>> >>> Although I don't know if the scientific use of XMPP extensions mirrors >>> practical deployment, I would assume that there are certain similarities. >>> In response to a request during this year's summit in Diegem, Belgium, my >>> dear colleague Daniel Schuster from TU Dresden created a tag cloud of the >>> XEPs in scientific use, extracted from 250 different papers: >>> http://www.xmppresearch.org/posts/xeps-used-in-xmpp-research/ >>> >>> >> That's awesome; I'll link to that in the Myth Two section. >> >> >>> Myth Three: >>> >>> There is quite some scientific evidence on the use of XMPP in >>> bandwidth-critical, mobile settings, especially in the last five years. >>> You find literature on mobile sensor networks, mobile apps, IoT, etc., >>> some of them applied in disaster scenarios with no or very impaired public >>> communication infrastructure. Bandwidth-efficiency is hardly ever mentioned >>> as a problem. >>> >>> >> Yes, I'll poke about and see how much of the use-cases I'm aware of can be >> talked about openly, since there's sectors using XMPP over low-bandwidth >> for mission-critical messaging that are really eye-opening - and I didn't >> even know about the disaster cases - links would be great. > > About the disaster cases: > > Klauck, Ronny; Gäbler, Jan; Kirsche, Michael; Schoepke, Sebastian (2011): > Mobile XMPP and Cloud Service Collaboration: An Alliance for Flexible > Disaster Management. In: 7th International Conference on Collaborative > Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing, CollaborateCom 2011, > Orlando, FL, USA, 15-18 October, 2011, pp. 201–210, IEEE, 2011. > > Link: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=6144805 > <http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=6144805> > > Klauck, Ronny; Kirsche, Michael (2012): XMPP to the Rescue: Enhancing Post > Disaster Management and Joint Task Force Work. In: Pervasive Computing and > Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops), 2012 IEEE International > Conference on, pp. 752–757, IEEE, 2012. > > Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PerComW.2012.6197613 > <http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PerComW.2012.6197613> > > Klauck, Ronny; Kirsche, Michael (2013): Combining Mobile XMPP Entities and > Cloud Services for Collaborative Post-Disaster Management in Hybrid Network > Environments. In: Mobile Networks and Applications - The Journal of SPECIAL > ISSUES on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing, 18 (2), pp. 253 – > 270, 2013. > > Link: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11036-012-0391-1 > <http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11036-012-0391-1> > > About Mobile & IoT applications of XMPP in research: > > Go to http://www.xmppresearch.org/bibliography/ > <http://www.xmppresearch.org/bibliography/> and check the tag cloud on top of > the page. "Mobile" is THE top tag (with 56 papers from 2004-now). For IoT we > collected 30 papers from 2009-now. By clicking on the tags, you get the full > list. By following links you at least get the abstracts. For reading the full > paper, you'll most likely slam against the paywall. > > Best, > Dominik > >> >> >>> Best, >>> Dominik >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Am 10.08.2015 um 18:02 schrieb Dave Cridland: >>> >>>> I've noticed that a large well-funded group have been attending a number >>>> of >>>> conferences and making unfortunately ill-informed statements about XMPP, >>>> in >>>> favour of their own solution in a number of spaces in which we overlap. >>>> >>>> In conformity with Napoleon's suggestion that one should never attribute >>>> to >>>> malice that which can adequately be explained by incompetence, I have >>>> tried >>>> to address these statements directly, but sadly while representatives of >>>> the organization were willing to agree they would correct their website, >>>> they have remained too incompetent to do so. >>>> >>>> This is terribly unfortunate, and so to help address this I knocked up >>>> some >>>> answers to specific "myths" on a Wiki page, intended (by me) as a draft >>>> blog post (but it could just as well stay on the Wiki, get reused as >>>> website content, or whatever). >>>> >>>> It's here: http://wiki.xmpp.org/web/index.php?title=Myths >>>> >>>> Suggestions and corrections would be very much welcome; feel free to >>>> either >>>> edit directly, or (possibly preferable) discuss in the XSF chatroom at >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> Dave. >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > <renzel.vcf>
