Thu, 5 Nov 2015 12:02:14 -0800 Philipp Hancke <[email protected]> wrote:
> Am 05.11.2015 um 11:51 schrieb Travis Burtrum: > > Hello Peter, > > > > On 11/05/2015 01:27 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > >> I haven't yet had time to look at your proposal in detail. However, > >> there is no _tls Protocol name in RFC 2782 or RFC 6335. It seems > >> strange for us to be the only ones using that non-standard value. > > > > At least Microsoft Lync and *I think* SIP (though I can't find a > > reference right now) use 'tls' for the Protocol value as well. > > Also RFC 2782 does not define values for it, leaving it to be any > > 'defined name' > > turns out I was wrong about Lync which uses > _sipfederationtls._tcp > to achieve this. SIP doesn't have _tls as well. It uses _sips._tcp for this as described in RFC3263.
