Dave Cridland <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well. If you're going to be picky... :-)
FIGHT :-) > Standard ESMTP doesn't allow pipelining at all, you'd need RFC 2920 support > for that Yeah, sorry, I used an ill-advised shorthand when I should have said ESMTP plus common standard extensions. But this is beside the point that SMTP is really weird from the TLS and X.509 perspective in allowing multiple reference identities in one transaction - no need to get funny with esoteric extensions. (Actually you don't even need one transaction, different transactions in the same connection are enough. For a practical example, Gmail splits transactions that span multiple recipient domains using temporary errors like "451 4.3.0 Multiple destination domains per transaction is unsupported. Please try again." But Gmail is OK if you use multiple different domains in different transactions in the same connection. The transaction splitting is probably for per-domain content policies, but it cannot do anything to help X.509 validation.) XMPP is much more straightforward for X.509 in that the connection says up front that it is dealing with a single domain. > > South Biscay, Southeast Fitzroy: Variable 3 or 4, becoming > > southwesterly 4 or 5 later. Rough. Occasional drizzle. Good, > > occasionally moderate. > > Quite surprised it's not worse. The fun is happening further north - see below. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/ Shannon, South Rockall: Southwesterly veering westerly later, 7 to severe gale 9, increasing storm 10 or violent storm 11 later. Very rough or high, becoming high or very high later. Rain or thundery showers. Moderate or poor, occasionally good.
