On 04.07.2016 15:55, Holger Weiß wrote: > Would people be fine with defining a standard name for a room > configuration setting that enables/disables MUC MAM (e.g., > muc#roomconfig_mam)? That way, clients that don't want to present the > full configuration form could offer a knob for that. > > If nobody objects, I'd submit a PR against XEP-0045 (or should this > rather go into XEP-0313?).
Sounds good to me. I've a slight feeling that this should go into xep313 or maybe even in an extra XEP: MUC-with-MAM (or MAM-with-MUC?), but no strong opinion about it. - Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
