On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 03:55:49PM +0200, Holger Weiß wrote: > Would people be fine with defining a standard name for a room > configuration setting that enables/disables MUC MAM (e.g., > muc#roomconfig_mam)? That way, clients that don't want to present the > full configuration form could offer a knob for that.
Is there any reason not to reuse muc#roomconfig_enablelogging? What you ultimately want to configure as a user is logging, not any specific protocol to access it, imo. There is at least one implementation[1] doing it that way. > > If nobody objects, I'd submit a PR against XEP-0045 (or should this > rather go into XEP-0313?). > > Holger [1] https://hg.prosody.im/prosody-modules/file/tip/mod_mam_muc/mod_mam_muc.lua#l14 -- Emmanuel Gil Peyrot _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
