On 4 Jul 2016, at 14:55, Holger Weiß <[email protected]> wrote: > Would people be fine with defining a standard name for a room > configuration setting that enables/disables MUC MAM (e.g., > muc#roomconfig_mam)? That way, clients that don't want to present the > full configuration form could offer a knob for that.
I think that, in general, a registry of common options is sensible (and ideally better defined than what’s currently in 45, which is a bit wooly in places). > If nobody objects, I'd submit a PR against XEP-0045 (or should this > rather go into XEP-0313?). 45’s the right place, I think, along with all the other standard options. /K _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
