On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Dave Cridland <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm suggesting we have to have MUC specifically. If a server can implement > any specification they like for any of these features, then Skype qualifies.
It's not any spec they want, it's any spec we list. If it really is MUC only, then maybe we should go back to doing these XEP based instead of feature based (or a mix of the two? That feels confusing, but I do think there are some where it makes a lot more sense to list a feature and not a specific implementation). —Sam -- Sam Whited pub 4096R/54083AE104EA7AD3 https://blog.samwhited.com _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
