On 2016-08-18 13:09, Emmanuel Gil Peyrot wrote: > On that basis, maybe I could make @name optional, as in “MAY NOT be > included for those three XEPs already listed”, “SHOULD for any > mechanism not listed here”, and “SHOULD be ignored on a received > message if you already have a correct name for it and can present it to > the user”? > > Anyway, no matter the solution chosen, I will include the reasoning and > other solutions that have not been taken in the next revision of this > XEP.
A registry of i18n'd names might be useful as a shared resource somewhere, so you could look up an appropriate name based on the namespace. -- Kim "Zash" Alvefur
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
