On 18 Aug 2016 13:00, "Kim Alvefur" <z...@zash.se> wrote: > > On 2016-08-18 13:09, Emmanuel Gil Peyrot wrote: > > On that basis, maybe I could make @name optional, as in “MAY NOT be > > included for those three XEPs already listed”, “SHOULD for any > > mechanism not listed here”, and “SHOULD be ignored on a received > > message if you already have a correct name for it and can present it to > > the user”? > > > > Anyway, no matter the solution chosen, I will include the reasoning and > > other solutions that have not been taken in the next revision of this > > XEP. > > A registry of i18n'd names might be useful as a shared resource > somewhere, so you could look up an appropriate name based on the namespace. > >
Is OTR, or PGP, typically translated? In any case, the name is, I understood, a convenience for clients that do not recognise the namespace. I18n considerations feel like optimizing for this failure case. > > -- > Kim "Zash" Alvefur > > > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list > Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards > Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org > _______________________________________________ >
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
