I think it's to early to deprecate Message Archiving while MAM is just experimental. That said, I suggest adding a disclaimer to Message Archiving stating that new installations should consider MAM instead.
- Florian On Sep 19, 2016 18:51, "Sam Whited" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I was looking at an issue on an XMPP project recently where someone > asked for support for XEP-0136: Message Archiving. As far as I know, > 0136 isn't really used anywhere anymore, and most everyone has > switched over to MAM. Having both XEPs seems like it's just confusing > people. I understand that Message Archiving is draft, and MAM is still > experimental (and that there are probably still outstanding changes > that need to be made), but can we deprecate Message Archiving and > piont people to MAM instead for the sake of reducing confusion? > > It seems poor to recommend Message Archiving (by virtue of it being > draft) when most individuals would recommend MAM, and the entire > community is using it. I don't see a problem with deprecating Message > Archiving while leaving MAM in the experimental state. > > Thoughts? > > —Sam > > > -- > Sam Whited > pub 4096R/54083AE104EA7AD3 > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list > Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards > Unsubscribe: [email protected] > _______________________________________________ >
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
