I think it's to early to deprecate Message Archiving while MAM is just
experimental. That said, I suggest adding a disclaimer to Message Archiving
stating that new installations should consider MAM instead.
On Sep 19, 2016 18:51, "Sam Whited" <s...@samwhited.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I was looking at an issue on an XMPP project recently where someone
> asked for support for XEP-0136: Message Archiving. As far as I know,
> 0136 isn't really used anywhere anymore, and most everyone has
> switched over to MAM. Having both XEPs seems like it's just confusing
> people. I understand that Message Archiving is draft, and MAM is still
> experimental (and that there are probably still outstanding changes
> that need to be made), but can we deprecate Message Archiving and
> piont people to MAM instead for the sake of reducing confusion?
> It seems poor to recommend Message Archiving (by virtue of it being
> draft) when most individuals would recommend MAM, and the entire
> community is using it. I don't see a problem with deprecating Message
> Archiving while leaving MAM in the experimental state.
> Sam Whited
> pub 4096R/54083AE104EA7AD3
> Standards mailing list
> Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
> Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org
Standards mailing list