On 30.03.2017 15:54, Remko Tronçon wrote: > On 30 March 2017 at 15:10, Andreas Straub <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > You raise a valid point. I agree that this construction seems > cleaner from a purely theoretical standpoint. > > Permissible implementations of XEdDSA may or may not emerge, but as long > as it is not something available, you're taking a risk of making a > standard that will never be adopted. > … > I agree that losing the audit is a downside, but I'm not sure if the > alternative is realistic if you want your XEP to take off.
I'm under the impression that OMEMO already took off. So I don't share the concern that libsignal being GPL hinders adoption in any way. - Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
