On 30.03.2017 18:24, Kevin Smith wrote:
> OMEMO’s initial publication was delayed for some time, in large part because 
> of the need to move away from a situation where it can only be practically 
> implemented by using a single library. It’s a shame if we’ve still not 
> resolved that adequately.

I remember OMEMO's initial publication being delayed because there was
no open standard for the underlying crypto. The Axolotl/Signal protocol
at that time was merely an outdated Wiki page on Github. That's why the
current version of the OMEMO XEP uses OLM.

The fact how the main implementation is licensed didn't matter in the
debate back then. At least from what I remember. And I think it
shouldn't matter right now.

- Florian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to