> On 31 Mar 2017, at 22:21, Matthew Hodgson <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm a bit confused as to why the OMEMO community has moved away from Olm in > favour of creating a new ODR, to be honest - I assumed that by releasing Olm > under the Apache license and getting it publicly audited NCC Group > (https://nccgroup.trust/us/our-research/matrix-olm-cryptographic-review) it > would be really useful for precisely this sort of use case. For context, I > know of no other publicly audited double ratchet implementation (including > libsignal...) > > If there are security concerns with it, please can someone let us know? P.S. The java bindings for Olm are at http://matrix.org/git/olm/tree/android/olm-sdk/src/main/java/org/matrix/olm and work well. Someone was also working on decoupling it from Android a few days ago, if that's a concern, and seemed to be making progress: cf https://matrix.to/#/!XqBunHwQIXUiqCaoxq:matrix.org/$14906146401780876rvwUY:matrix.org M
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
