Hi Matthew, On 31 March 2017 at 23:21, Matthew Hodgson <[email protected]> wrote:
> http://matrix.org/docs/olm_signing.html attempts to describe this > trade-off. > Thanks for sharing your insights. I didn't know about that document, and the tradeoffs and decisions you described make sense. >From my point of view, that was the only negative argument I could find against Olm. I suggest we change the XEP to move back to Olm, and extend it to include the identity key signatures and fingerprints. We'll have to decide what to do with the pre-key signatures, and document that as well. thanks, Remko
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
