Hi, thank you Andy for writing all that up.
2017-05-24 22:55 GMT+02:00 Andreas Straub <[email protected]>: > All that said, maybe my assessment of the situation is totally off. If the > wider community still wants to move forward with this, then I don't want to > be the only one standing in the way. But in that case, somebody else should > probably take over. I'm really not sure where the myth originates from that there is a consensus around Remko's proposal. The main argument for the Olm approach is the missing XEdDSA implementation and that is - as Andy explains - blown completely out of proportion. I want to stress that me not repeating the same arguments over and over again does not mean I agree with Remkos proposal. cheers Daniel _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
