On 25.05.2017 10:56, Dave Cridland wrote: > On 25 May 2017 at 08:26, Florian Schmaus <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 25.05.2017 08:04, Remko Tronçon wrote: >>> On 24 May 2017 at 22:55, Andreas Straub <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> I just don't see the major implementations switching over any time soon >>> >>> I have serious doubts that at least one of them won't have to do *some* >>> significant work to get rid of the libsignal dependency to be legally in >>> order, which will mean implementing the ratchet and XEdDSA itself >>> (unless a library emerges that implements this all from scratch). >> >> Why do you think the existing implementations using libsignal are not >> legally in order? >> > > I think Smack, while legally in order, is in trouble here.
Thanks Dave, but Remko's statement reads like *every* OMEMO implementation based on libsignal is legally not in order. Which is a pretty strong claim, and is borderline, or at least gives the impression of spreading fear, uncertainty and doubt. I hope we do not reach those levels in any discussion within the XSF. - Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
