On 25.05.2017 08:04, Remko Tronçon wrote: > On 24 May 2017 at 22:55, Andreas Straub <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Yes, it's true that there's currently no such thing for XEdDSA, but > is this actually a concrete problem for anyone? > > > Yes. I obviously can't speak for all the other clients that currently > don't support OMEMO, but for Swift, XEdDSA is blocking OMEMO support for > both technical and legal reasons.
Care to elaborate on these technical and legal reasons? >> I just don't see the major implementations switching over any time soon > > I have serious doubts that at least one of them won't have to do *some* > significant work to get rid of the libsignal dependency to be legally in > order, which will mean implementing the ratchet and XEdDSA itself > (unless a library emerges that implements this all from scratch). Why do you think the existing implementations using libsignal are not legally in order? - Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
