On 25 May 2017 at 10:01, Florian Schmaus <f...@geekplace.eu> wrote: > On 25.05.2017 10:56, Dave Cridland wrote: >> On 25 May 2017 at 08:26, Florian Schmaus <f...@geekplace.eu> wrote: >>> On 25.05.2017 08:04, Remko Tronçon wrote: >>>> On 24 May 2017 at 22:55, Andreas Straub <a...@strb.org >>>> <mailto:a...@strb.org>> wrote: >>>>> I just don't see the major implementations switching over any time soon >>>> >>>> I have serious doubts that at least one of them won't have to do *some* >>>> significant work to get rid of the libsignal dependency to be legally in >>>> order, which will mean implementing the ratchet and XEdDSA itself >>>> (unless a library emerges that implements this all from scratch). >>> >>> Why do you think the existing implementations using libsignal are not >>> legally in order? >>> >> >> I think Smack, while legally in order, is in trouble here. > > Thanks Dave, but Remko's statement reads like *every* OMEMO > implementation based on libsignal is legally not in order. Which is a > pretty strong claim, and is borderline, or at least gives the impression > of spreading fear, uncertainty and doubt. >
I did not read Remko's statement in that way. Dave. _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
