On 30 May 2017, at 15:18, Daniel Gultsch <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2017-05-30 16:02 GMT+02:00 Dave Cridland <[email protected]>: >> Presence, mind, I'm not so sold on - I think it's significantly less >> important, since presence is stateful rather than an event. But I'm >> not averse to it - I'd just argue that if it causes problems, just >> don't bother delay-stamping. > > I have no hard feelings regarding presence however if we stamp with > the account jid it wont cause problems. > And people are really obsessed with 'Last Seen' Whatapp-like > information. (That's how I stumbled over the problem in the first > place.) So in their interest it would really help to have a more > detailed time information on presence as well. (Mind you CSI can > easily delay those information by multiple hours)
I’m not sure, given the peculiarities of presence probes and S2S and etc., that using presence for this is particularly reliable. I could wrong (again). /K _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
