On 7 Jun 2017, at 21:49, Vanitas Vitae <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree. Its not exactly nice to deny the existing implementations the > name OMEMO, since those implementations are what gave OMEMO its > reputation, so could we please agree on the fact, that existing > implementations are OMEMO?
I think that’s what the compromise proposal achieves, yes. /K _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
