I think Tobias is currently writing a summary of the discussion
including the compromise, so lets just wait for that :)


Am 07.06.2017 um 23:15 schrieb Ignat Gavrilov:
> Before anyone (including me) gets outrageous here, I wonder what this 
> compromise is exactly: 
>
> a) The OMEMO-siacs is put into the/a XEP and all future standardizing work is 
> put into OMEMO-NEXT (not using XEdDSA) which will then become the next 
> version of the XEP (maybe in years). There won't be any work or updates on 
> XEdDSA-based OMEMO.
> b) The OMEMO-siacs is put into the/a XEP and both protocols are developed 
> independently (learning from each other), keeping the XEdDSA-based OMEMO 
> alife for some time, including changes like ODR and at some point (maybe in 
> years) move over to OMEMO-NEXT.
> c) The OMEMO-siacs is put into the/a XEP and both protocols are developed 
> independently (learning from each other), keeping the XEdDSA-based OMEMO 
> alife for some time, including changes like ODR and nobody cares about 
> OMEMO-NEXT
>
> I don't care about which XEP number exactly is used for what. Seriously XEP 
> numbers are for developers and not for users and if we want XMPP to survive 
> we have to put the effort into the users, so the majority of XMPP developers 
> should not care about which XEP has which number, as long as it supports the 
> protocols used by the users, right?
>
> Ignat.
>
>
>> ----------------------------------------
>> From: Kevin Smith <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Wed Jun 07 22:57:16 CEST 2017
>> To: XMPP Standards <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [Standards] Don't let today be the day we bury OMEMO
>>
>> I think that’s what the compromise proposal achieves, yes.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Standards mailing list
> Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
> Unsubscribe: [email protected]
> _______________________________________________

_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to