On 15 November 2017 at 09:15, Goffi <go...@goffi.org> wrote: > Good morning/evening/day eveybody > > Le mercredi 15 novembre 2017, 09:54:07 CET Dave Cridland a écrit : >> Conversations is following an existing trend. Sam has merely documented it, >> and we're trying to ensure that the downsides of this approach - and I >> don't think anyone pretends there aren't any - are mitigated. >> >> This is not ideal, it is not perfect, but I think we're well into von >> Clausevitz territory[1], and the question should be whether we can control >> the inevitable damage. > > So shouldn't the type of the XEP (if it becomes one) be "informational" > instead? At least this show this is not a good practice supported by the > community. >
I don't care hugely what type it is, though to suggest its entirely unsupported by the community suggests that Spark, Gajim, Psi and Conversations are not part of this community, which I would hold to be demonstrably incorrect. > And please if it really do through the official number, add on "opt-in" > mechanism as previously discussed (this is still not in the protoXEP). As an aside, I really hate working on XEPs before we accept them. However, this might fall closely enough under the "wrong approach" criteria that I can be persuaded. Dave. _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
