On 05.11.2017 19:21, Ruslan N. Marchenko wrote:
Hi,
On 16.10.2017 20:38, Jonas Wielicki (XSF Editor) wrote:
5. Is the specification accurate and clearly written?
The first thing I stumbled upon while starting drafting implementation
is - empty result.
<iq><fin/></iq>?
<iq><fin><set/></fin></iq>?
<iq><fin><set><count>0</count></set></fin></iq>?
Or perhaps even <item-not-found/>?
Some more questions:
2.
XEP states at 6.1.1
> 'roster' - messages are archived only if the contact's bare JID is in
the user's roster.
shouldn't it say instead - if contact's bare JID is in the user's roster
with 'from' or 'both' subscription.
Or perhaps - for incoming messages should be at least 'to' and for
outgoing - 'from'?
3.
Should we consider full run against both always and never to find
most-specific match or we just do first-hit and ignore the rest?
The former sounds more plausible to me as it allows fine-tuning with
blocking a specific resource or in opposite - archive only a specific
resource.
On the other hand later is more simplistic for implementation.
4.
Then - what is the order of comparison? I.e. if (for some unknown
reason) jid is present in both always and never lists with identical
precision?
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org
_______________________________________________
