On 18 January 2018 at 10:50, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 18 Jan 2018, at 08:28, Dave Cridland <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 1) Roll Call
>> Kev sent apologies; his votes will be on list.
>
> Enclosed.
>
>> 3) ProtoXEP - User Invitations
>> Daniel and Sam on-list, Georg and Dave +1.
>> Kev on-list.
>
> Which is https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/user-invite.html I assume.
>
> Not blocking this (+1), but the addition of fields into IBR seems wrong - 
> don’t we have xep4 in IBR for this reason?
>

Similar comments were made in the meeting, which I didn't capture.

Loosely, it's generally agreed that this is not a great idea, but
there was some suggestion (from Georg) that forms were a less than
ideal solution as well.

In any case, this ProtoXEP is now voted to be adopted and further
discussion on this point and others is of course very welcome.

>> 4) XEP-0286, Advance to Active
>>
>> All present +1.
>>
>> Kev on-list.
>
> I’ll abstain/+0 this one, only because  no-one at all felt the need to 
> support it in the LC (that I could find in my archives).
>

Vote passes.

>> 5) https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/554
>>
>> Sam on-list, others +1.
>>
>> Kev on-list.
>
> +1, natch.
>

Vote passes.

>>
>> 6) https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/557
>>
>> Council decided to vote in the absence of further list discussion.
>>
>> All present in favour, Kev to vote on list.
>
> +1
>

Vote passes.

>> 7) XEP-0387, Advance to Draft
>>
>> Note this is without addressing Kev's outstanding feedback.
>>
>> Sam, Georg, Daniel +1
>>
>> Dave 0 (Specifically, felt it was pointless moving forward without
>> addressing or merging Kev's PR, but felt it was Kev's decision to make
>> here).
>>
>> Kev on-list.
>
> I’m +1 once my PR addressing the outstanding list feedback is merged.

To be clear, that's a -1 with a clear remediation, is that correct?

> (Technically the vote shouldn't have happened until after the LC feedback was 
> addressed, but I suppose it doesn’t really matter the order as long as both 
> things happen)

I decided I'd be somewhat fast and loose with what "addressed" means
in this instance.

Dave.
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to