On 18 Jan 2018, at 13:21, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 18 Jan 2018, at 11:05, Dave Cridland <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> 7) XEP-0387, Advance to Draft >>>> >>>> Note this is without addressing Kev's outstanding feedback. >>>> >>>> Sam, Georg, Daniel +1 >>>> >>>> Dave 0 (Specifically, felt it was pointless moving forward without >>>> addressing or merging Kev's PR, but felt it was Kev's decision to make >>>> here). >>>> >>>> Kev on-list. >>> >>> I’m +1 once my PR addressing the outstanding list feedback is merged. >> >> To be clear, that's a -1 with a clear remediation, is that correct? > > I’d rather we treated it as a pre-emptive +1, conditioned on the merge, to > avoid process ensuring we have to drag this out longer than needed, but you > could also view it as a -1 for now, with a new vote after the merge.
And yes, the remediation is clear on the -1. /K _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
