On 18 Jan 2018, at 15:43, Sam Whited <s...@samwhited.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018, at 09:39, Dave Cridland wrote: >> To suggest that a Council Member voting -1 is stalling is a very >> serious charge, and suggests that they are deliberately misusing the >> standards process to the detriment of their position. >> >> Therefore I would like to give you the opportunity to retract that >> accusation. > > I don't think there is any malicious intent behind this if that's what you > mean, but I absolutely think this is just stalling because the initial > feedback window was missed and I do not want to spend any more time and > effort on an XEP with constantly shifting goalposts that can never be > published because there's always one more change that needs to be made before > it's perfect.
So, to summarise here. I sent my feedback out before it was required by a Council vote, so that we would be able to address it all before the vote, and not add additional delays by first -1ing it, then giving feedback, then voting again. But if you would rather, you can pretend that I didn’t give any feedback for the most recent Last Call, waited until the meeting yesterday, and posted it all to standards@ as the suggested remediation for -1 in the meeting. The end result is largely the same, but I did it in a manner that meant we would be able to have had it advanced by now, had that been important to us. /K _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
