On Donnerstag, 8. Februar 2018 14:34:12 CET W. Martin Borgert wrote: > Quoting Daniel Gultsch <dan...@gultsch.de>: > > polling is a terrible idea traffic wise and very nontransparent for the > > user. > > > > I don't have an opinion on pubsub. > > I had another idea before coming up with the configuration variable, > but I find it very ugly, but maybe others might find some beauty > (or pragmatism) in it: > > A PubSub node could have a "magic" node
We need to get this terminology straight. When you say "PubSub node", do you in fact mean a pubsub node (i.e. a specific @node value on a specific pubsub service with JID X) or a PubSub service with JID X? I think specifying avatars for each PubSub *node* could be tricky. For services (which I assume you meant) see below. > , i.e. with the magic id > "pubsub_logo". This node contains the logo, it can be upgraded and > notification to users would be immediate. But a "magic id"? Like > "favicon.ico"? The "magic id" (again, only for PubSub services, not for individual nodes) is obvious, I’d simply use the same the XEP-0084 uses. That could even work magically with client code. kind regards, Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
