On 12 Feb 2018, at 15:50, Goffi <go...@goffi.org> wrote:
> Le jeudi 8 février 2018, 16:59:47 CET W. Martin Borgert a écrit :
>> For e.g. Movim both a logo for service and for a node seems to be
> icons for service and node are useful indeed
It’s something we were thinking about the other day as well (although more
service than node).
>>> I think specifying avatars for each PubSub *node* could be tricky. For
>>> services (which I assume you meant) see below.
>> If there were a "magic" item on a node, it never must be removed
>> automatically, but only on user request, right?
> I find this thing awfull, it's mixing metadata with main data.
Possibly. Although we already have a mechanism for avatars in pubsub items, and
it might be convenient to have the same mechanism for users, services and
> I think we would do better by implementing a notification mecanism for config
> options, as notification may be useful not only for avatar/icon. We could
> use the same sementic as for nodes, but with a different namespace.
Or for those nodes that can have avatars, define some 346ish node mapping to
find them? Not convinced this is the right approach either.
Standards mailing list