On 12/16/18 2:37 AM, Jonas Schäfer wrote: > This may sound ridiculous at first, given that the text easily fits on less > than 10 pages in font size, but bear with me. > > I was proposing an LC for it to Kevin, because the protocol IMO is rather > mature, but then I realized that we have a slight issue here: > > - The protocol could probably even be put in Final right now, it seems very > "done" to me. > - We can never put the required support of hash functions to Final. > > So I suggest to split XEP-0300 into two parts: > > 1. A Standards Track part which includes only the protocol. > 2. An Informational part which includes only the hash function > recommendations, as well as the related XEPs section.
+1, although the hash function *recommendations* don't exactly feel informational to me. Peter
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
