On 16 Dec 2018, at 09:37, Jonas Schäfer <[email protected]> wrote: > > This may sound ridiculous at first, given that the text easily fits on less > than 10 pages in font size, but bear with me. > > I was proposing an LC for it to Kevin, because the protocol IMO is rather > mature, but then I realized that we have a slight issue here: > > - The protocol could probably even be put in Final right now, it seems very > "done" to me. > - We can never put the required support of hash functions to Final. > > So I suggest to split XEP-0300 into two parts: > > 1. A Standards Track part which includes only the protocol. > 2. An Informational part which includes only the hash function > recommendations, as well as the related XEPs section. > > What do you folks think?
Whatever the track of the MTI hashes, I think we do need it split if we’re to advance the protocol part. /K _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
