That specification isn't linked from XEP-0384 at all, so how are we supposed to be able to tell it affects OMEMO?
On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 at 17:30, Paul Schaub <[email protected]> wrote: > That is true. > The related part of the double ratchet spec is > https://signal.org/docs/specifications/doubleratchet/#out-of-order-messages > > Paul > > 28.12.2019 18:11:18 Philipp Hörist <[email protected]>: > > Hi, > > > 4.5 Exchanging Ephemeral OMEMO Messages > > OMEMO requires that messages are delivered in a sequence. If a message > is missing, all the following messages cannot be decrypted and a new > session has to be established. > > This is wrong, OMEMO can well deal with missing messages, this and all > subsequent points that build on that assumption should be removed from the > XEP > > Regards > Philipp > > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list > Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards > Unsubscribe: [email protected] > _______________________________________________ >
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
