On Sun, 24 May 2020 at 11:37, Matthew Wild <mwi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, 24 May 2020, 11:32 Dave Cridland, <d...@cridland.net> wrote: > >> Would .well-known work? So for status information on xmpp:jabber.fr, >>> you'd follow redirects from >>> https://jabber.fr/.well-known/xmpp-server-status and get a status page >>> back. Could easily have two, for machine-readable versus human readable, >>> too. >> >> > I wonder if the best approach is to add to 157 as proposed, and then add a > .well-known mapping for the entire of 157. >
Even better. Dave.
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
