On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 3:32 AM Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 12/15/24 7:57 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: > > > There is one additional possible process deviation we should document > > (or call the Process Police out, or something). Submission of a XEP, as > > per XEP-0143, occurs via email tot he Editor. Is this really still the > > case? Or are these now by PR? That'll need changing in XEP-0143, which > > I'm happy to do if that's the case. It'd be nice to have a non-PR > > variant of the process (post here?) > > In the recent past I've seen specs submitted via email (e.g., MUC Slow > Mode). But it does happen via PR and we might even want to settle on > that as the preferred method. I'd defer to Daniel on that.
Slow mode was submitted as PR after I instructed the author to do so. And yes PRs is what I prefer and what I strongly suggest we use going forward. _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
