On 16/12/2024 08.22, Daniel Gultsch wrote:
I'd like us to keep a non-github XEP submission door open. Therefore, I would offer myself to process XEP submissions via [email protected]. Only if it's ok with Daniel, of course.On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 3:32 AM Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote:On 12/15/24 7:57 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:There is one additional possible process deviation we should document (or call the Process Police out, or something). Submission of a XEP, as per XEP-0143, occurs via email tot he Editor. Is this really still the case? Or are these now by PR? That'll need changing in XEP-0143, which I'm happy to do if that's the case. It'd be nice to have a non-PR variant of the process (post here?)In the recent past I've seen specs submitted via email (e.g., MUC Slow Mode). But it does happen via PR and we might even want to settle on that as the preferred method. I'd defer to Daniel on that.Slow mode was submitted as PR after I instructed the author to do so. And yes PRs is what I prefer and what I strongly suggest we use going forward.
This would require me to be added to the editor@ alias and probably also mean that I officially need to rejoin the XEP editors team (of which I once was part of and where I did some processing, but was later correctly dropped due to inactivity).
- Flow
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
