stdlib-sig  

Messages by Date

• 2009/11/08 Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are) Brett Cannon
• 2009/11/08 Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are) Georg Brandl
• 2009/11/08 Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are) Yuvgoog Greenle
• 2009/11/08 Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are) Ben Finney
• 2009/11/08 Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are) Antoine Pitrou
• 2009/11/08 Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are) Michael Foord
• 2009/11/08 Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are) Guido van Rossum
• 2009/11/08 Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are) C. Titus Brown
• 2009/11/08 Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are) Michael Foord
• 2009/11/08 [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are) Brett Cannon
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution Brett Cannon
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution Antoine Pitrou
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - PEP and API Antoine Pitrou
• 2009/11/07 [stdlib-sig] comments on PEP for futures - execute computations asynchronously Jim Jewett
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - PEP and API Brian Quinlan
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures and deferreds Brian Quinlan
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution Brett Cannon
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution Jeffrey Yasskin
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution Jesse Noller
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution Laura Creighton
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] Concurrent/Jython (was: futures - a new package for asynchronous execution) Jesse Noller
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution Jesse Noller
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution Paul Moore
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution Paul Moore
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution Frank Wierzbicki
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution Frank Wierzbicki
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution Georg Brandl
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - PEP and API Antoine Pitrou
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures and deferreds Antoine Pitrou
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution Jesse Noller
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution Antoine Pitrou
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution Jesse Noller
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution Jesse Noller
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution Jesse Noller
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution Jesse Noller
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution Antoine Pitrou
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution Antoine Pitrou
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution Paul Moore
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution Brian Quinlan
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution Frank Wierzbicki
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution Jesse Noller
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution Paul Moore
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution Brian Quinlan
• 2009/11/07 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution Paul Moore
• 2009/11/06 Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution Brian Quinlan
• 2009/10/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] ctypes or struct from an h file Yuvgoog Greenle
• 2009/10/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] ctypes or struct from an h file Benjamin Peterson
• 2009/10/18 [stdlib-sig] ctypes or struct from an h file Yuvgoog Greenle
• 2009/10/12 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Doug Hellmann
• 2009/10/12 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Vinay Sajip
• 2009/10/12 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Jesse Noller
• 2009/10/11 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Vinay Sajip
• 2009/10/11 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Brett Cannon
• 2009/10/11 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Vinay Sajip
• 2009/10/01 [stdlib-sig] standard metadata for the standard library (Was: Re: [Python-Dev] sharing stdlib across python implementations) Kevin Teague
• 2009/09/27 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Ben Finney
• 2009/09/26 Re: [stdlib-sig] ConfigParser - parsing options with no value Mats Kindahl
• 2009/09/21 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Barry Warsaw
• 2009/09/21 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Thomas Heller
• 2009/09/20 Re: [stdlib-sig] urllib.parrrrse does not supporrrrt bytes Armin Ronacher
• 2009/09/20 Re: [stdlib-sig] urllib.parrrrse does not supporrrrt bytes M.-A. Lemburg
• 2009/09/20 Re: [stdlib-sig] urllib.parrrrse does not supporrrrt bytes Antoine Pitrou
• 2009/09/20 Re: [stdlib-sig] urllib.parrrrse does not supporrrrt bytes Armin Ronacher
• 2009/09/20 Re: [stdlib-sig] urllib.parrrrse does not supporrrrt bytes Armin Ronacher
• 2009/09/20 Re: [stdlib-sig] urllib.parrrrse does not supporrrrt bytes Senthil Kumaran
• 2009/09/20 Re: [stdlib-sig] urllib.parrrrse does not supporrrrt bytes Ronald Oussoren
• 2009/09/20 Re: [stdlib-sig] urllib.parrrrse does not supporrrrt bytes Senthil Kumaran
• 2009/09/20 Re: [stdlib-sig] urllib.parrrrse does not supporrrrt bytes Armin Ronacher
• 2009/09/20 Re: [stdlib-sig] urllib.parrrrse does not supporrrrt bytes Antoine Pitrou
• 2009/09/20 Re: [stdlib-sig] urllib.parrrrse does not supporrrrt bytes Armin Ronacher
• 2009/09/20 Re: [stdlib-sig] urllib.parrrrse does not supporrrrt bytes Michael Foord
• 2009/09/20 Re: [stdlib-sig] urllib.parrrrse does not supporrrrt bytes Antoine Pitrou
• 2009/09/19 Re: [stdlib-sig] urllib.parrrrse does not supporrrrt bytes Brett Cannon
• 2009/09/19 Re: [stdlib-sig] urllib.parrrrse does not supporrrrt bytes Georg Brandl
• 2009/09/19 Re: [stdlib-sig] urllib.parrrrse does not supporrrrt bytes Armin Ronacher
• 2009/09/19 Re: [stdlib-sig] urllib.parrrrse does not supporrrrt bytes Brett Cannon
• 2009/09/19 [stdlib-sig] urllib.parrrrse does not supporrrrt bytes Armin Ronacher
• 2009/09/19 Re: [stdlib-sig] ConfigParser - parsing options with no value Michael Foord
• 2009/09/19 Re: [stdlib-sig] ConfigParser - parsing options with no value Vinay Sajip
• 2009/09/19 Re: [stdlib-sig] ConfigParser - parsing options with no value Michael Foord
• 2009/09/19 Re: [stdlib-sig] ConfigParser - parsing options with no value Vinay Sajip
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] ConfigParser - parsing options with no value Michael Foord
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] ConfigParser - parsing options with no value Vinay Sajip
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Thomas Heller
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Jesse Noller
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Barry Warsaw
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Vinay Sajip
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Thomas Heller
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Vinay Sajip
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Vinay Sajip
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Vinay Sajip
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Paul Moore
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Jesse Noller
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Georg Brandl
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] Evolving the Standard Library Armin Ronacher
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] Evolving the Standard Library Paul Moore
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Jesse Noller
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Georg Brandl
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Jesse Noller
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Doug Hellmann
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] Evolving the Standard Library Armin Ronacher
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Vinay Sajip
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] Evolving the Standard Library Vinay Sajip
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Barry Warsaw
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] Evolving the Standard Library Armin Ronacher
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging John Szakmeister
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Vinay Sajip
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Vinay Sajip
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Tarek Ziadé
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Vinay Sajip
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Vinay Sajip
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Tarek Ziadé
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Tarek Ziadé
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Vinay Sajip
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] logging Antoine Pitrou
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] Evolving the Standard Library Vinay Sajip
• 2009/09/18 Re: [stdlib-sig] Evolving the Standard Library Vinay Sajip
• 2009/09/17 Re: [stdlib-sig] ConfigParser - parsing options with no value Jesse Noller
• 2009/09/17 Re: [stdlib-sig] ConfigParser - parsing options with no value Michael Foord
• 2009/09/17 Re: [stdlib-sig] ConfigParser - parsing options with no value Michael Foord
• 2009/09/17 Re: [stdlib-sig] ConfigParser - parsing options with no value Jesse Noller
• 2009/09/17 Re: [stdlib-sig] ConfigParser - parsing options with no value Michael
• 2009/09/17 Re: [stdlib-sig] ConfigParser - parsing options with no value Michael Foord
• 2009/09/17 Re: [stdlib-sig] ConfigParser - parsing options with no value Antoine Pitrou
• 2009/09/17 Re: [stdlib-sig] Evolving the Standard Library Yuvgoog Greenle
• 2009/09/17 Re: [stdlib-sig] ConfigParser - parsing options with no value Jesse Noller
• 2009/09/17 Re: [stdlib-sig] ConfigParser - parsing options with no value Michael Foord
• 2009/09/17 Re: [stdlib-sig] Evolving the Standard Library Raymond Hettinger
• 2009/09/17 Re: [stdlib-sig] Evolving the Standard Library Armin Ronacher
• 2009/09/17 Re: [stdlib-sig] Evolving the Standard Library Raymond Hettinger
• 2009/09/17 Re: [stdlib-sig] Evolving the Standard Library Armin Ronacher
• 2009/09/17 Re: [stdlib-sig] ConfigParser - parsing options with no value Georg Brandl
• 2009/09/17 Re: [stdlib-sig] ConfigParser - parsing options with no value R. David Murray
• 2009/09/17 Re: [stdlib-sig] ConfigParser - parsing options with no value Mats Kindahl
• 2009/09/17 Re: [stdlib-sig] ConfigParser - parsing options with no value M.-A. Lemburg
• 2009/09/17 Re: [stdlib-sig] Evolving the Standard Library Michael Foord
• 2009/09/17 Re: [stdlib-sig] Evolving the Standard Library Brett Cannon
• 2009/09/17 Re: [stdlib-sig] Evolving the Standard Library R. David Murray
• 2009/09/17 Re: [stdlib-sig] ConfigParser - parsing options with no value Brett Cannon
• 2009/09/17 Re: [stdlib-sig] Evolving the Standard Library Vinay Sajip
• 2009/09/17 [stdlib-sig] ConfigParser - parsing options with no value Mats Kindahl
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? Brett Cannon
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? Brett Cannon
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] GHOP / py3k (was: Evolving the Standard Library) C. Titus Brown
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] GHOP / py3k Georg Brandl
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] GHOP / py3k Michael Foord
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] GHOP / py3k (was: Evolving the Standard Library) Brett Cannon
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] GHOP / py3k Georg Brandl
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] Backwards compat (was: Evolving the Standard Library) Tarek Ziadé
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] Breaking out the stdlib M.-A. Lemburg
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] Evolving the Standard Library Michael Foord
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] Python-the-platform vs Python-the-framework Antoine Pitrou
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] Evolving the Standard Library M.-A. Lemburg
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] Backwards compat (was: Evolving the Standard Library) Tarek Ziadé
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] Backwards compat (was: Evolving the Standard Library) C. Titus Brown
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] Backwards compat (was: Evolving the Standard Library) Tarek Ziadé
• 2009/09/16 [stdlib-sig] Python-the-platform vs Python-the-framework Orestis Markou
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? Mark Dickinson
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] GHOP / py3k (was: Evolving the Standard Library) C. Titus Brown
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? Antoine Pitrou
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] Backwards compat (was: Evolving the Standard Library) C. Titus Brown
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] Evolving the Standard Library Armin Ronacher
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] Evolving the Standard Library Armin Ronacher
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] Evolving the Standard Library Tarek Ziadé
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] Evolving the Standard Library Jesse Noller
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] Evolving the Standard Library Jesse Noller
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] Evolving the Standard Library Michael Foord
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] Evolving the Standard Library Antoine Pitrou
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] Evolving the Standard Library Michael Foord
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] Evolving the Standard Library John Szakmeister
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? Georg Brandl
• 2009/09/16 [stdlib-sig] Evolving the Standard Library Armin Ronacher
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? Armin Ronacher
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? Armin Ronacher
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? Michael Foord
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? Georg Brandl
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? Georg Brandl
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? M.-A. Lemburg
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? Laura Creighton
• 2009/09/16 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? Georg Brandl
• 2009/09/15 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? Jesse Noller
• 2009/09/15 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? Raymond Hettinger
• 2009/09/15 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? R. David Murray
• 2009/09/15 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? Brett Cannon
• 2009/09/15 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? Yuvgoog Greenle
• 2009/09/15 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? Brett Cannon
• 2009/09/15 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? R. David Murray
• 2009/09/15 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? Jesse Noller
• 2009/09/15 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? C. Titus Brown
• 2009/09/15 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? Yuvgoog Greenle
• 2009/09/15 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? R. David Murray
• 2009/09/15 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? R. David Murray
• 2009/09/15 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? Jesse Noller
• 2009/09/15 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? Jesse Noller
• 2009/09/15 Re: [stdlib-sig] Breaking out the stdlib Antoine Pitrou
• 2009/09/15 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? Benjamin Peterson
• 2009/09/15 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? Jesse Noller
• 2009/09/15 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? Tarek Ziadé
• 2009/09/15 Re: [stdlib-sig] MISC/maintainers.txt anyone? Jesse Noller
• 2009/09/15 Re: [stdlib-sig] Breaking out the stdlib Jesse Noller

• Earlier messages
• Later messages