On 1/30/07, Rick McNeal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, to make a long story short I've spotted the bug in the daemon. It'll take a couple of days to make the fix only because I've got a couple of things on my plate which need to be completed first.
Any chance you could give a (brief) outline of the bug? I started digging into the iscsitgt code a little tonight but a quick pointer would help things along. Regards, Eric
On Jan 30, 2007, at 8:56 PM, Wally Hunt wrote: > "Whenever the NOP-In is sent as a "ping" to an initiator (not as a > response to a NOP-Out), the StatSN field will contain the next > StatSN. However, StatSN for this connection is not advanced.". > That dosen't seem to be occuring in this situation. > > w > > > This message posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > storage-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss ---- Rick McNeal "If ignorance is bliss, this lesson would appear to be a deliberate attempt on your part to deprive me of happiness, the pursuit of which is my unalienable right according to the Declaration of Independence. I therefore assert my patriotic prerogative not to know this material. I'll be out on the playground." -- Calvin _______________________________________________ storage-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
-- Eric Enright _______________________________________________ storage-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
