There's no setting to make a share browsable. If you define a share
which has the SMB protocol enable, it should be browsable. If you
cannot see them via Network Neighborhood then something should be
wrong.

Afshin

Rob Nelson wrote:
> Its sort of inferred in Doug's blog that turning on a sharesmb in zfs 
> will allow the browsablity of the share in Windows Network 
> Neighborhood.  But its not totally clear to me.  In my setup I have a 
> share working fine if I explicitly access it from Windows in explorer 
> with a \\servername\sharename or from Mac in Finder with a 
> smb://servername/sharename, but I don't see this computer in Network 
> Neighborhood.
> 
>  From Doug's blog:
> 
> When using SMB, things are a bit different:
> 
> zfs set sharesmb=on data
> 
>  From a Windows browser, you will see:
> 
>     data_user1
>     data_user2
>     data_user2_database
> 
> 
> Is there some setting the needs to be called to explicitly so a share is 
> "browsable" in Network Neighborhood on Windows or in the Finder on Mac?  
> Does smbd need to be told to allow browsablity?
> 
> Not having AD/RFC 2307 schema support is killer in a big shop.  An Admin 
> wants to manage UIDs/SIDs in one place, be it Java Dir. Services, Open 
> Dir., or AD.  I assume by "currently" you mean its in the works ;)
> 
> -nola
> 
> 
> 
> On Nov 29, 2007, at 2:16 PM, Natalie Li wrote:
> 
>> This blog should address your first question:
>>
>> http://blogs.sun.com/dougm/entry/thoughts_on_extending_sharemgr_to
>>
>> Currently, CIFS server doesn't authenticate with AD/RFC 2307 schema.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Natalie
>>
>> Rob Nelson wrote:
>>
>>> Goodday group.
>>>
>>> Question1: Is there a sharectl/sharesmb/sharemgr command to config 
>>> the share to be browsable on the Windows network?
>>>
>>>
>>> Question2: The ephemeral IDs are nice.  In a Windows only shop, no 
>>> config required in the AD server.  It has the "it works" option.
>>>
>>> But if your in a true Solaris/Mac/Windows shop, where you need to 
>>> support users that will log into all OSs, and need only one SID and 
>>> one UID, don't ephemeral ID break down here?  What are the options 
>>> here?  Will the integration into AD with RFC 2307 support installed 
>>> work?  I.e. 
>>> http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/04/25/solaris-10-ad-integration-version-3/
>>>
>>> In other words how do you have the CIFS server authenticate with 
>>> AD/RFC 2307 schema, retrieve the UID/GID from AD lookup and use these 
>>> on the OpenSolaris side?
>>>
>>> How do you set this up?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> nola
>>> This message posted from opensolaris.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> storage-discuss mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>
> 

_______________________________________________
storage-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss

Reply via email to