On Feb 5, 2008, at 4:34 PM, John Tracy wrote: > The problem happened again (as expected). I did apply an IDR patch > as recommended by Sun, patch IDR137189-02 for those who may be > interested. After issuing a reboot, I then started hammering away at > the iSCSI targets on this box again. These patches seem to primarily > have to do with ZFS items. I'm thinking that this may be off the > mark, as even while the performance is terrible with iSCSI mounted > volumes, local IO operations on the box utilizing the same ZFS pool > are as quick as should be expected. > > Just out of curiosity, I generated a core of the iscsitgtd and then > ran mdk against it. This is the result. I'm not sure where to go > from here:
Targeted for builds 63, 64 & 65, are a set of fixes that address issues covering memory leaks, unexpected asserts() and better interaction with ZFS and zvols. > > I found a few recent bugs noted for iscsitgt mentioning memory > leaks: 6657591 6652170. Perhaps this is related? > > -John > > > This message posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > storage-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss Jim Dunham Storage Platform Software Group Sun Microsystems, Inc. work: 781.442.4042 cell: 603-724-3972 http://blogs.sun.com/avs http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/avs/ http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/iscsitgt/ http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/storage/ _______________________________________________ storage-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
