On Feb 6, 2008, at 5:23 AM, Jim Dunham wrote: In the posting below I incorrectly stated the build numbers for the forthcoming iSCSI Target fixes. They're targeting builds snv_83, snv_84 & snv_85.
My 5:23 AM posting, must have happened before the coffee actually started to work. :-o Jim > > On Feb 5, 2008, at 4:34 PM, John Tracy wrote: > >> The problem happened again (as expected). I did apply an IDR patch >> as recommended by Sun, patch IDR137189-02 for those who may be >> interested. After issuing a reboot, I then started hammering away at >> the iSCSI targets on this box again. These patches seem to primarily >> have to do with ZFS items. I'm thinking that this may be off the >> mark, as even while the performance is terrible with iSCSI mounted >> volumes, local IO operations on the box utilizing the same ZFS pool >> are as quick as should be expected. >> >> Just out of curiosity, I generated a core of the iscsitgtd and then >> ran mdk against it. This is the result. I'm not sure where to go >> from here: > > Targeted for builds 63, 64 & 65, are a set of fixes that address > issues covering memory leaks, unexpected asserts() and better > interaction with ZFS and zvols. > >> >> I found a few recent bugs noted for iscsitgt mentioning memory >> leaks: 6657591 6652170. Perhaps this is related? >> >> -John >> >> >> This message posted from opensolaris.org >> _______________________________________________ >> storage-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss > _______________________________________________ storage-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
