The problem reappeared this afternoon after the daemon was up for about two 
hours. I generated a series of cores on the iscsitgtd process if anybody is 
interested (I have UMEM_LOGGING enabled). I can make them available on a 
website or e-mail them (they are 17 megs each). The cores definitely show 
something going on with memory leaks. In six minutes of uptime for the 
iscsitgtd, I went from 302 to 324 leaks :

# mdb afterend3
Loading modules: [ ld.so.1 libumem.so.1 libavl.so.1 libc.so.1 libnvpair.so.1 
libuutil.so.1 ]
> ::findleaks
CACHE             LEAKED           BUFCTL CALLER
0000000000484028     301 00000000005129a0 iscsi_full_feature+0x365
0000000000487368       1 0000000000517a80 libc.so.1`_thr_setup+0x5b
----------------------------------------------------------------------
           Total     302 buffers, 19424 bytes

And, six minutes later....:
# mdb afterend4
Loading modules: [ ld.so.1 libumem.so.1 libavl.so.1 libc.so.1 libnvpair.so.1 
libuutil.so.1 ]
> ::findleaks
CACHE             LEAKED           BUFCTL CALLER
0000000000484028     323 00000000005129a0 iscsi_full_feature+0x365
0000000000487368       1 0000000000517a80 libc.so.1`_thr_setup+0x5b
----------------------------------------------------------------------
           Total     324 buffers, 20832 bytes
>

The /tmp/target_log file was altogether empty. I'm wondering if I should just 
go ahead and install a new version of ON so as to ensure that I'm not simply 
running down a problem that was already fixed in ON but not put back to S10U4.

-John
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
storage-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss

Reply via email to