0n Thu, May 22, 2008 at 05:46:26PM -0600, Chris Horne wrote:
>> 0n Fri, May 23, 2008 at 08:19:03AM +1000, James C. McPherson wrote:
>>
>> >Rongsheng Fang wrote:
>> >> James,
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for you reply. We are currently using Veritas DMP for
>> >> multipathing. I understand MPxIO creates one psedo device to
represent
>> >> all the paths to a physical disk/LUN. So with MPxIO, does it mean
that
>> >> Solaris will just need to discover the MPxIO pseudo device
indtead of all
>> >> the paths a LUN thereforce make the boot process much shorter?
>> >
>> >Hi Rongshen,
>> >Yes, that is indeed the case.
>> >
>> >For Nevada we've made really big improvements in boot time
>> >for configurations such as yours - build 85 and later is
>> >looking really good in that area :-)
>
>...some of the important improvements are not there until 87.
>
>>
>> So conceptually, having multipathing software setup will speed up
bootstrap time
>> significantly ?
>
>MPxIO helps reduce public namespace overhead since all paths to a
>device show up under a single public name.
What is meant by a "public namespace" ?
-aW
IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence
Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the CRIMES ACT
1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact
the sender and delete the email.
_______________________________________________
storage-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss