Eric,

> Rick McNeal wrote:
>> It's possible someone is opening the device for exclusive use. Though
>> I would expect a different error number/message if that was the case.
>> I still need to look through the code and determine where an HARDWARE
>> check condition is set. Most likely during the initial opening of the
>> device which is part of the framework code and not the SCSI INQUIRY
>> command proper.
>
> Rick,
> I think the issue is pretty clear, at least from what I can see:

Why are you looking within the devices tree, instead of asking ZFS.

What do the following commands show?

zpool status
zpool list
zfs list
zpool export data
zpool import
zpool import data

- Jim

>
>
>>
>>> # ls -l /dev/zvol/rdsk/data/vol/
>>> total 3
>>> lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     root          42 Jan 20 12:33 lun001 ->
>>> ../../../../../devices/pseudo/z...@0:3c,raw
>>> lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     root          42 Jan 20 16:33 testlun ->
>>> ../../../../../devices/pseudo/z...@0:3c,raw
>>> lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     root          42 Jan 21 14:09 testlun1 ->
>>> ../../../../../devices/pseudo/z...@0:3c,raw
>>>
>>> # ls -l /devices/pseudo/zfs*
>>> brw-------   1 root     sys      182,  1 Jan 23 15:00 /devices/ 
>>> pseudo/z...@0:1c
>>> crw-------   1 root     sys      182,  1 Jan 23 15:00 /devices/ 
>>> pseudo/z...@0:1c,raw
>>> brw-------   1 root     sys      182,  2 Jan 23 15:00 /devices/ 
>>> pseudo/z...@0:2c
>>> crw-------   1 root     sys      182,  2 Jan 23 15:00 /devices/ 
>>> pseudo/z...@0:2c,raw
>>> crw-rw-rw-   1 root     sys      182,  0 Jan 23 14:29 /devices/ 
>>> pseudo/z...@0:zfs
>>>
>>> There are no "z...@0:3c" device nodes.  A "devfsadm -C" has no  
>>> effect.  I'm out
>>> of my depth with the zvol device nodes, so maybe someone can  
>>> enlighten me. :)
>
> I don't know how it could happen that my /dev entries for my zvols  
> points to a
> non-existent device.  I haven't tried to do anything "clever"-- just  
> using
> zfs(1M) to manage zvols and iSCSI sharing.
>
> Anyone care to speculate about what might have happened here?
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
> _______________________________________________
> storage-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss

_______________________________________________
storage-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss

Reply via email to