Hmm, it occurs to me that while its being changed to 255, it should be changed 
to 65536 or ~2.1million.

Read the comments here: http://blogs.sun.com/wdp/entry/comstar_iscsi

Tommy


On Nov 19, 2009, at 6:29 AM, Jim Dunham wrote:

> Tommy,
> 
>> Thanks for the response. I had heard rumor (read in comments on a sun blog) 
>> that the OpenStorage (fishworks) box only allows me to create 32 targets.
> 
> It is a fact that iSCSI Target in COMSTAR only supports 32 targets. Work is 
> in progress to increase this to 255. 
> 
>       http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6889663
> 
> Jim Dunham 
> Engineering Manager
> Core I/O - COMSTAR
> Open Storage Systems Group
> 
> 
>> It could be something underneath that is limiting that, but alas, 32 
>> targets. It appear that best practice is to create a target for a virtual 
>> machine, so that the "alias" is actually useful, like the VM-name. At that 
>> point, numbered LUNS aren't a big deal really as there would only really be 
>> a need for 2 at this point. In order to follow that scheme, I am going to 
>> need FAR more than 32 targets. Instead, I thought I would just create a 
>> single target for all the VMs in one "farm" and then I would be able to name 
>> the disks and refer to them by their name somehow. I guess thats out too. 
>> 
>> As a workaround I can create LUNs, specifying the LUN numbers, then just 
>> have some sort of "mapping" document that keeps track of the first 5 belong 
>> to vm-1 the next 5 belong to vm-2, etc.
>> 
>> I know I am just complaining, but I thought I'd make my case for iSCSI LUN 
>> aliases. Honestly, its the same problem over FC. Again the storage allows me 
>> to "name" the LUN, but when I get to the OS, I get a big list of obnoxiously 
>> named devices and I have to compare WWNs to figure out which is which. I 
>> guess I want alias names for LUNs in general then :)
>> 
>> Tommy
>> -- 
>> This message posted from opensolaris.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> storage-discuss mailing list
>> storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
> 

_______________________________________________
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss

Reply via email to