Thanks Tom

 

That was really informative.

 

I have been testing a TLUD coal stove from Turkey (“Silver” is the producer). 
The air supply needed work but it was very clean for a long time when not 
operated in the suggested manner (just about the opposite actually).

 

I have never seen so many zeros in a row. The CO/CO2 ratio fell below 0.00% 
(about 0.008%) for several hours burning wet lignite.

 

Operated as suggested the excess air dropped to less than 1% which obviously is 
not so good. 

 

It will get a few adjustments I feel – they received very specific alteration 
suggestions. The problem is the same as with all the batch stoves: if it is 
refuelled in a ‘traditional’ manner, the smoke is far worse than the 
traditional stove. That means training people not to do what comes naturally 
(let the stove die out and refuel and relight from scratch. Big task.

 

Regards

Crispin

 

+++

Subject: Re: [Stoves] [biochar] Capturing carbon in the timber industry

 

Crispin, 

 

Lots of work was done on bark utilization by Jean Mater, Mater Engineering, 
from about 1945 on. Her work is in USFS publications. Jean died a couple of 
years ago. When the US National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)was 
researching fast  pyrolysis the principal contractor (Midwest Research) 
patented several chemicals from bark pyrolysis with major wood industries. They 
were mostly resins for use as industrial adhesives. I think Ensyn (Canada) also 
has a process to make adhesives from pyrolysis products. As far as I know these 
products are not in commercial use.  

 

I'm sure that the cost to make charcoal for Maputo is considerably lower than 
here. One challenge for Southern Africa is how to make the portable metal bush 
kilns more efficient and environmentally friendly while keeping the cost and 
capital low enough to benefit the population that is now making charcoal. How 
can you make kilns that are more attractive than earth kilns? It's hard to beat 
labor vs capital.   

 

Oil making pyrolyzers have substantial capital investments. 70% yield oil (15% 
char + 15% gas) requires an industrial plant (Dynamotive, Ensysn). Either the 
gas or char is consumed in the process. Slow pyrolysis yields about equal 
quantities of oil, char and gas. In both cases you are externally heating the 
wood at about 450C. For high oil yields the wood is finely divided and 
typically pyrolyzed using an externally heated sand carrier, as in a 
circulating fluidized bed.  

 

Manuel Garcia Perez, Washington State University, provided a nice overview of 
pyrolysis technologies in his November  presentation at a Washington Future 
Energy Conference:

http://www.futureenergyconference.com/2010/FECWA-Presentations/4D_Garcia.pdf

 

Gasifiers yield 2-5% char and gas and tars. Reaction temperatures are about 
800C for the char. The beauty of the TLUD is the gas yield for cooking and a 
higher yield of char. 

 

Tom

 

_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
Stoves mailing list

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://www.bioenergylists.org/
[email protected]
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

Reply via email to