On Wednesday 22 December 2010 00:06:35 Crispin Pemberton-Pigott wrote: > >>That means training people not to do what comes > >> naturally (let the stove die out and refuel and relight from > >> scratch). > > Yeah. That is what I meant.
...and that's where I saw a point for confusion. It could read as letting the fire die out and then refuel being what comes naturally. In fact what comes naturally is to dump another batch of fuel on top of the glowing embers, this quenches any existing flame as the new load heats up and subsequently the new load starts pyrolysing with insufficient temperature or flame to burn the offgas. Pellet stoves get around the problem by feeding in a small amount of fresh fuel such that a continuous flame is maintained over the whole firebed. Everything has to pass through the flame. As a tlud maintains a fairly constant power if the primary air is well controlled then extended burn time can be got by increasing the height of the fuel. As this is often not practical there are a number of ways people have tried to get around it. Paul Anderson went for fuel cassettes that were pre loaded and alternated but it has not been mentioned recently. Top lighting for a clean start has been advocated by many, I think the masonry stove association mentioned it when [stoves] was young. TLUD is a special case where the progressive descent of the pyrolysis front provides an air free offgas that shields the char formed above from combustion. Change the conditions slightly by slowing the front or increasing the air supply and this char is consumed. I've seen no mention of particulates under these "no residual char" conditions. Generally particulates are formed in the secondary combustion area. From a long term health point of view particulates remain the bigger problem over straight thermal conversion efficiency. Richard asked: > Please tell me why adding a side feed feature to this stove would not > greatly improve the cool down start up problem /smoke/ you are > experiecning with your batch feed process ? Richard I don't know this stove, as Crispin has pointed out a modification made to steam locos was to auger a "molehill" of coal from under the firebed so the curtain of fire wasn't disturbed by a fresh cold batch of coal being dumped on it. Given we seem to be looking at 5kW stoves, that's about 1kg of drymatter per hour. What does one of your holey briquettes weigh when dry? Part of the way a tlud works is to do with the change in buoyancy of the gases as they evolve and then heat up. As we have discussed before I'd like to try making a semi continuous burner using holey briquettes in much the same way a rocket fuel in fed by pushing longer sticks into the fire chamber. As I see it we need to keep it as close coupled as possible because with these small devices if heat is lost in the primary combustion zone then the gases in the secondary zone have lost temperature and are diluted by CO2 and N2. The tlud avoids this problem by minimising the combustion products of char. AJH _______________________________________________ Stoves mailing list to Send a Message to the list, use the email address Stoves mailing list to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org for more Biomass Cooking Stoves, News and Information see our web site: http://www.bioenergylists.org/ [email protected] http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
