Index of SPPS Budget Discussion
http://www.e-democracy.org/stpaul/spps-posts.html
_________________________________________


I'm wondering, I heard you can get ticketed for going the speed limit in the left lane 
if it's holding up traffic, especially an impatient police officer. If that's true, I 
can't wait for the police to ticket someone with the $$ to take that law on in court. 

Drivin' the speed limit 35E - 

Nanette
MacGrove
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Fulton, Rob 
  To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 8:52 AM
  Subject: RE: [StPaul] Speed increases on 35E


  Index of SPPS Budget Discussion
  http://www.e-democracy.org/stpaul/spps-posts.html
  _________________________________________
   
   
  Two things.  I have observed twice in the past year, semi-trailer trucks
  pulled over and getting ticketed.  One way small way I work to slow traffic
  is use the left lane and drive at 45 along side a law abiding driver in the
  right lane.  Drives those SUVs crazy.

  Rob Fulton,

  Highland Park

  -----Original Message-----
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 8:47 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: [StPaul] Speed increases on 35E

  Index of SPPS Budget Discussion
  http://www.e-democracy.org/stpaul/spps-posts.html
  _________________________________________


  Every year, there's some lawmaker from the south who wants to
  change this. Rep. Wilkin this year, Sen. Day from years
  past.  They eventually realize that the reason the speed is
  at 45 is not the result of some state law that can be changed
  at the whim of a few leadfoots, but is indeed part of a
  federal court settlement that was entered into a long time
  ago with a number of litigants, some of whom are part of this
  discussion group.  Dan's right - the state would be in a bit
  of trouble were it to start picking and choosing which
  federal court settlements it wanted to adhere to.


  If Rep. Wilkin wants to undo the federal settlement, re-open
  the case, turn the clock back twenty or thirty years, tear
  out the road, replace the hundreds of homes that were removed,
   and then reopen the Environmental Impact Statement needed
  to build the road, cool.  But I do hope he realizes pretty
  soon that changing state law doesn't change the settlement
  agreement that the state entered into twenty years ago that
  outlined the deal that allowed the road to be built in the
  first place. 


  I particularly like the part where Rep. Wilkin insists that
  the State Legislature isn't bound by the agreement made by
  the State Department of Transportation. 


  Diane Gerth
  I really live in the West End

  _____________________________________________
  SPPS Budget Reduction Forum - Feb. 23-27
  Co-Sponsored By NEAT: http://www.stpaulneat.org/
  _____________________________________________
  NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
  http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

  Archive Address:
     http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/
  _____________________________________________
  SPPS Budget Reduction Forum - Feb. 23-27
  Co-Sponsored By NEAT: http://www.stpaulneat.org/
  _____________________________________________
  NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
  http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

  Archive Address:
     http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/
_____________________________________________
SPPS Budget Reduction Forum - Feb. 23-27
Co-Sponsored By NEAT: http://www.stpaulneat.org/
_____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

Reply via email to