Index of SPPS Budget Discussion
http://www.e-democracy.org/stpaul/spps-posts.html
_________________________________________
 
 
This is an e-mail I sent to the St. Paul School Board.


--- Dan Dobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 08:45:51 -0800 (PST)
> From: Dan Dobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Let's add the Preamble to the Constitution
to the Pledge of Allegiance 

To: Toni Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Elona Street-Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Kazoua Kong-Thao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
John Broderick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Anne Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Al Oertwig
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Tom Conlon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Saint Paul School Board Members -
 
(Hi Al, Anne, John and Toni)
 
As the Pledge of Allegiance debate has raged and I
have followed Michael Newdow's efforts to remove the
words "Under God" from the Pledge, I twice tried to
write a new pledge. The results were pretty clumsy
and other stuff other people sent me was not much
better. 
 
However today, I came across the following op-ed
piece that presents an entirely new unique position,
that I like a lot more. 
 
"Make children say the preamble instead of the
Pledge"
http://www.theunionleader.com/articles_showa.html?article=35065

I would propose that in addition to reciting the
Pledge of Allegiance once a week, children in the
St. Paul School system also recite the Preamble to the
Constitution. The author, Linda Monk, makes the
case, why she thinks the Preamble to the Constitution
is better than the Pledge of Allegiance.
 
Dan Dobson
Saint Paul, Minnesota 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
======================================================
Another View:
Make children say the preamble instead of the Pledge
By LINDA R. MONK
Guest Commentary
  
THE SUPREME Court is hearing oral argument on one of
the more explosive questions before it: whether
public school teachers can lead students in the Pledge
of Allegiance to a nation �under God.� 
 
In the Newdow case, the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the 9th Circuit ruled that public school teachers
within that circuit (comprising nine Western states)
violate the First Amendment when they lead students,
even those who are willing, in the pledge. The court
said that teachers are endorsing religion, contrary to
the establishment clause, when they lead the class in
reciting the pledge�s words �one nation under God.�

In a public school setting, the lower court held,
nonbelieving children can be coerced by teachers�
actions in a way that adults are not. 
 
The best solution to this problem � one that
respects both the community�s desire to instill
patriotism and the conscience of religious dissenters
� is to end recitation not just of the words �under
God� but of the entire Pledge of Allegiance. In its
place would go a much better statement of our national
values: the preamble to the Constitution. 
 
The nation�s founders wrote the preamble in 1787.
The pledge was written in 1892 by a socialist minister
to honor Christopher Columbus in a children�s
magazine.
�Under God� wasn�t even in it until 1954, after a
campaign by the Knights of Columbus. 
 
Why the preamble? Because it affirms the sovereignty
of �we the people,� who strive for a �more perfect
union� and thus �do ordain and establish this
Constitution.� That last part is trickier than it
seems. It unites citizens in an ongoing responsibility
to uphold constitutional values, not just mouth
loyalty oaths. 
 
It�s important to remember the Pledge of Allegiance
itself has a mottled history � unsurprising in a
nation where people take oaths seriously. When World
War II was brewing in Europe, Jehovah�s Witnesses
were the most disliked religious group in America
because they opposed saying the Pledge of Allegiance. 

What could it hurt, argued countless school boards
and eight Supreme Court justices in a 1940 ruling, for
schoolchildren to learn a lesson in patriotism?
Jehovah�s Witnesses responded that swearing an oath
to a flag was the equivalent of worshiping a graven
image. They also noted the similarity of the flag
salute, which then involved children pointing their
outstretched right arms toward the flag, to the
�Heil Hitler� salute of Nazi Germany. The Nazis were
at
that time persecuting Jehovah�s Witnesses for refusing
to give that salute. 
 
After the 1940 court decision on the pledge,
Witnesses� children could be denied the right to
attend school, even if they stood respectfully and
quietly during the pledge. The court�s ruling
unleashed a wave of violence against Witnesses
nationwide, with 335 attacks against 1,500 Witnesses
in 1940 alone � including a castration in Nebraska. 

Out of shame over the wave of religious violence it
had triggered, the Supreme Court overturned itself
only three years later, the fastest reversal in its
history. Wrote Justice Robert Jackson, who later
served as a prosecutor in the Nuremberg trials, �To
believe that patriotism will not flourish if
patriotic ceremonies are voluntary and spontaneous
instead of a compulsory routine is to make an
unflattering estimate of the appeal of our
institutions to free minds.� 
 
As amended in 1954, the Pledge of Allegiance makes a
statement about God�s role in the republic that the
framers of the Constitution omitted in 1787. True,
the signature line of the Constitution does include
the
standard dating convention �in the year of our Lord,�
but that hardly qualifies as an assertion equivalent
to �one nation under God.� Despite pleas in the
ratification debates to add such divine references to
the Constitution, the framers believed these are the
words we all can agree on: 

�We the people, of the United States, in order to
form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure
domestic tranquility, provide for the common
defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the
blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity,
do ordain and establish this Constitution for the
United States of America.� 
 
Linda Monk is the author of �The Words We Live By:
Your Annotated Guide to the Constitution.� 
 
 

 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
_____________________________________________
SPPS Budget Reduction Forum - Feb. 23-27
Co-Sponsored By NEAT: http://www.stpaulneat.org/
_____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

Reply via email to