Much of this debate is predicated on the belief that one side has been wholly
reasonable and the other wholly unreasonable. Considering that no one contested
Jeanne's 8/26 report of the behavior of the ordinance opposition it is interesting
that anyone on this list serve would argue that the stubborness exists on only one
side of the table.
I also think it's interesting that no one answered Jeanne's e-mail about whether or
not the new ordinance met the criteria laid out in the Mayor's previous veto message.
Since the ordinance will be signed or vetoed by the Mayor, this is the debate relevant
to the passage of the policy.
The major concerns related to the inclusion of smoking rooms and the exclusion of a
regional approach. Those concerns have both been met.
Matt Flory
Mac Groveland
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter now.
_____________________________________________
To Join: St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul
Archive Address:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/
